Knowledge sources arranged into decision support
All workflows

Content and knowledge

Knowledge intake and decision support

Make scattered documents, messages, and research useful for a bounded decision without treating generated summaries as a source of truth.

Trigger

A team needs to answer a recurring question using material spread across documents, conversations, or approved external sources.

Outcome

A decision-ready brief with cited inputs, known gaps, owner, and a route for human review.

Related operating model

Knowledge intake and decision support

  1. 01

    Define the question

    Set the decision, audience, time range, trusted sources, and what a useful answer must include.

  2. 02

    Collect and separate

    Bring approved inputs together while retaining source, date, confidence, and any access boundary.

  3. 03

    Prepare the brief

    Extract, compare, and summarise with links back to inputs; mark conflicts and missing evidence clearly.

  4. 04

    Review and decide

    Give an accountable person the brief, decision options, and a way to correct or extend the knowledge base.

Useful when

People repeatedly search for the same context, rebuild handovers, or make decisions from partial memory.

Do not use this model when

The required sources, access rights, retention boundary, or accountable decision owner are unknown.

Controls that keep the workflow usable

A reliable system names its owner, retains the context needed for a decision, gives exceptions a visible path, and leaves a record of what happened.

  • Every material answer can be traced back to a source or is explicitly marked as a hypothesis.
  • Access and retention rules are defined before material is added to a shared system.
  • Human review remains mandatory for high-impact or uncertain decisions.